The Official MobyMemory MMC - Connection Test Results: 1. Via USB2 Card Reader: (Fastest Transfer Mechanism available) | Performance Tests: MobyMemory MMC Card (using USB2 7-in-1 MobyMemory Card Reader, Dell 400SC / Win2003 Server) | Test File Size (Bytes) | WRITE Speed | READ Speed | Duration (Secs.) | Bytes Transferred (per second) | Duration (Secs.) | Bytes Transferred (per second) | 1Gb MMC | 1,026,980,369 | 501 | 2,049,861 | 464 | 2,213,320 | 512mb MMC | 511,199,012 | 250 | 2,044,796 | 236 | 2,166,098 | 256mb MMC | 255,675,273 | 128 | 1,997,463 | 119 | 2,148,532 | 128mb MMC | 128,159,862 | 65 | 1,971,690 | 60 | 2,135,998 |
Note: These tests were conducted at the command-line using the copy command to transfer a single test file (.zip) to and from one connected drive (C: drive) to another ([Removable Drive]). Read/write results will vary according to differing environmental test conditions; including USB port implementations on the PC (and USB port number used), other running operations on the PC(incl services etc), the card reader used, the USB cable, and the PC itself . For best results, the [Card Reader]-[Cable]-[PC USB port] connection should be USB2 (or USB Hi-Speed) end-to-end. Also, the number of files transferred can have a significant impact on peformance (Many smaller files, of the same total size, will be slower to transfer than 1 large file). 2. Via PCMCIA Card Reader: | Performance Tests: MobyMemory MMC Card (using PCMCIA 5-in-1 MobyMemory Card Reader, Samsung Q20, WinXP) | Test File Size (Bytes) | WRITE Speed | READ Speed | Duration (Secs.) | Bytes Transferred (per second) | Duration (Secs.) | Bytes Transferred (per second) | 1Gb MMC | -* | - | - | - | - | 512mb MMC | 511,199,012 | 331 | 1,544,408 | - | - | 256mb MMC | 255,675,273 | 167 | 1,530,990 | - | - | 128mb MMC | 128,159,862 | 84 | 1,525,713 | - | - |
*5-in-1 PCMCIA Reader does not handle 1Gb MMC reliably. Typically found to be 3/4th to 2/3rd speed of a USB2 connection. 3. Via USB Mobile Cable: Speed varies for each mobile. Invariably slower than the first 2 connection options. 4. Via Bluetooth / 5. Infra-red (IrDA): Again, speeds varies for each mobile and each bluetooth dongle. Invariably slower than the first 2 connection options. IrDA is usually quicker than bluetooth implementations, but less flexible (needs clear line-of-sight, and to be within few feet of connecting device for good connection).
 Webmaster www.MobyMemory.com London, UK |